Information for "V v Associated Newspapers Ltd (2015) EWCOP 83"
Basic information
| Display title | V v Associated Newspapers Ltd [2015] EWCOP 83 |
| Default sort key | V v Associated Newspapers Ltd (2015) EWCOP 83 |
| Page length (in bytes) | 969 |
| Page ID | 8352 |
| Page content language | en - English |
| Page content model | wikitext |
| Indexing by robots | Allowed |
| Number of redirects to this page | 1 |
| Counted as a content page | Yes |
Page protection
| Edit | Allow only users with "editing" permission (infinite) |
| Move | Allow only users with "editing" permission (infinite) |
Edit history
| Page creator | Jonathan (talk | contribs) |
| Date of page creation | 21:30, 22 December 2015 |
| Latest editor | Jonathan (talk | contribs) |
| Date of latest edit | 11:21, 2 April 2025 |
| Total number of edits | 7 |
| Total number of distinct authors | 1 |
| Recent number of edits (within past 90 days) | 5 |
| Recent number of distinct authors | 1 |
Page properties
SEO properties
Description | Content |
Article description: (description)This attribute controls the content of the description and og:description elements. | "MacDonald J ... concluded C did have capacity to refuse the treatment and dismissed the application by the Hospital Trust. C, sadly, died on 28 November 2015. ... I was notified at about 5.45 pm on 2 December 2015 that an application was likely to be made by Mr Vikram Sachdeva Q.C. on behalf of C's daughter, V, for the RRO to be extended after C's death. ... There is no issue between the parties that the court has jurisdiction to extend a RRO in these circumstances. ... I concluded the RRO should be extended for 7 days to enable an effective inter partes hearing to take place." |