Information for "VX v KX (2024) EWCOP 78 (T2)"
Basic information
| Display title | VX v KX [2024] EWCOP 78 (T2) |
| Default sort key | VX v KX (2024) EWCOP 78 (T2) |
| Page length (in bytes) | 687 |
| Page ID | 16218 |
| Page content language | en - English |
| Page content model | wikitext |
| Indexing by robots | Allowed |
| Number of redirects to this page | 0 |
Page protection
| Edit | Allow only users with "editing" permission (infinite) |
| Move | Allow only users with "editing" permission (infinite) |
Edit history
| Page creator | Jonathan (talk | contribs) |
| Date of page creation | 12:56, 10 February 2025 |
| Latest editor | Jonathan (talk | contribs) |
| Date of latest edit | 12:56, 10 February 2025 |
| Total number of edits | 1 |
| Total number of distinct authors | 1 |
| Recent number of edits (within past 90 days) | 1 |
| Recent number of distinct authors | 1 |
Page properties
SEO properties
Description | Content |
Article description: (description)This attribute controls the content of the description and og:description elements. | SX had executed both types of LPA in favour of different children. (1) The court revoked the health and welfare LPA. (2) For pragmatic reasons, to avoid delaying the move to a new residential care home, the court did not revoke the property and affairs LPA, but said that if the attorneys did not "disclaim their lasting powers of attorney at the first opportunity so that a panel deputy can be appointed" then the LPA would be revoked. |