| Display title | University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust v Thirumalesh [2023] EWCOP 43 |
| Default sort key | University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust v Thirumalesh (2023) EWCOP 43 |
| Page length (in bytes) | 713 |
| Page ID | 15817 |
| Page content language | en - English |
| Page content model | wikitext |
| Indexing by robots | Allowed |
| Number of redirects to this page | 0 |
| Counted as a content page | Yes |
| Page image |  |
| Edit | Allow only users with "editing" permission (infinite) |
| Move | Allow only users with "editing" permission (infinite) |
| Page creator | Jonathan (talk | contribs) |
| Date of page creation | 11:11, 10 October 2024 |
| Latest editor | Jonathan (talk | contribs) |
| Date of latest edit | 11:15, 10 October 2024 |
| Total number of edits | 2 |
| Total number of distinct authors | 1 |
| Recent number of edits (within past 90 days) | 2 |
| Recent number of distinct authors | 1 |
Description | Content |
Article description: (description)
This attribute controls the content of the description and og:description elements. | Following the patient's death, her family applied for discharge of a transparency order, and the Trust argued for its continuation for a further 8 weeks. The judge noted that there is little practical difference between transparency orders and reporting restrictions orders (RROs) and uniform terminology would be more desirable. |
