Information for "Stott v Leadec Ltd (2020) UKEAT 263/19"
Basic information
Display title | Stott v Leadec Ltd (2020) UKEAT 263/19 |
Default sort key | Stott v Leadec Ltd (2020) UKEAT 263/19 |
Page length (in bytes) | 571 |
Page ID | 10911 |
Page content language | en - English |
Page content model | wikitext |
Indexing by robots | Allowed |
Number of redirects to this page | 0 |
Page protection
Edit | Allow only users with "editing" permission (infinite) |
Move | Allow only users with "editing" permission (infinite) |
Edit history
Page creator | Jonathan (talk | contribs) |
Date of page creation | 17:25, 29 August 2020 |
Latest editor | Jonathan (talk | contribs) |
Date of latest edit | 12:54, 21 October 2024 |
Total number of edits | 3 |
Total number of distinct authors | 1 |
Recent number of edits (within past 90 days) | 0 |
Recent number of distinct authors | 0 |
Page properties
Transcluded templates (10) | Templates used on this page:
|
SEO properties
Description | Content |
Article description: (description )This attribute controls the content of the description and og:description elements. | The Employment Appeal Tribunal adjourned for a medical report on litigation capacity and commented on the continuing lack of rules rules containing clearly defined powers in relation to proceedings involving protected parties (as defined in Part 21 of the CPR) in employment tribunals and in the EAT. |