Information for "Smith v Cosworth Casting Processes Ltd (1997) EWCA Civ 1099"

Basic information

Display title	Smith v Cosworth Casting Processes Ltd [1997] EWCA Civ 1099
Default sort key	Smith v Cosworth Casting Processes Ltd (1997) EWCA Civ 1099
Page length (in bytes)	1,200
Page ID	14990
Page content language	en - English
Page content model	wikitext
Indexing by robots	Allowed
Number of redirects to this page	0
Counted as a content page	Yes

Edit	Allow only users with "editing" permission (infinite)
Move	Allow only users with "editing" permission (infinite)

Page creator	Jonathan (talk \| contribs)
Date of page creation	12:25, 23 March 2023
Latest editor	Jonathan (talk \| contribs)
Date of latest edit	12:25, 23 March 2023
Total number of edits	1
Total number of distinct authors	1
Recent number of edits (within past 90 days)	0
Recent number of distinct authors	0

Hidden categories (2)	This page is a member of 2 hidden categories: Category:Judgment available on Bailii Category:Pages using DynamicPageList3 parser function
Transcluded templates (10)	Templates used on this page: Template:Add drilldown link date (view source) Template:Add drilldown links (view source) Template:Add drilldown links ul (view source) Template:Case (view source) Template:Case subject note (view source) Template:Database header (view source) Template:Extension DPL (view source) Template:Linkless exists (view source) Template:Page creation date (view source) Template:What links here (view source)

Description	Content
Article description: (`description`) This attribute controls the content of the `description` and `og:description` elements.	"(1) The court will only refuse leave if satisfied that the applicant has no realistic prospect of succeeding on the appeal. This test is not meant to be any different from that which is sometimes used, which is that the applicant has no arguable case. Why however this court has decided to adopt the former phrase is because the use of the word "realistic" makes it clear that a fanciful prospect or an unrealistic argument is not sufficient. (2) The court can grant the application even if it is not so satisfied. There can be many reasons for granting leave even if the court is not satisfied that the appeal has any prospect of success. For example, the issue may be one which the court considers should in the public interest be examined by this court or, to be more specific, this court may take the view that the case raises an issue where the law requires clarifying."

Information from Extension:WikiSEO