Information for "Sherwood Forest Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust v C (2020) EWCOP 10"
Basic information
Display title | Sherwood Forest Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust v C [2020] EWCOP 10 |
Default sort key | Sherwood Forest Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust v C (2020) EWCOP 10 |
Page length (in bytes) | 1,138 |
Page ID | 10838 |
Page content language | en - English |
Page content model | wikitext |
Indexing by robots | Allowed |
Number of redirects to this page | 0 |
Counted as a content page | Yes |
Page image | ![]() |
Page protection
Edit | Allow only users with "editing" permission (infinite) |
Move | Allow only users with "editing" permission (infinite) |
Edit history
Page creator | Jonathan (talk | contribs) |
Date of page creation | 13:47, 6 July 2020 |
Latest editor | Jonathan (talk | contribs) |
Date of latest edit | 11:54, 8 October 2021 |
Total number of edits | 3 |
Total number of distinct authors | 1 |
Recent number of edits (within past 90 days) | 0 |
Recent number of distinct authors | 0 |
Page properties
SEO properties
Description | Content |
Article description: (description )This attribute controls the content of the description and og:description elements. | (1) Having previously undergone two hysteroscopies, and initially consented to removal of her ovaries and fallopian tubes, C disengaged, expressed religious views (such as that only God could cure her cancer), and was assessed as lacking capacity. The judge decided that "she clearly lacked capacity and her rejection of the treatment, which is clinically so manifestly in her best interests, is predicated on a delusional belief structure which manifests itself in the language of religion". (2) The delay in this case, which was attributable to the treating clinicians not initially knowing C had paranoid schizophrenia, and their reluctance to contemplate coercion, should not have happened and likely stressed C and her family, but had not led to neglect of the cancer. |