Display title | Rotherham Metropolitan Borough Council v ZZ [2020] EWHC 185 (Fam) |
Default sort key | Rotherham Metropolitan Borough Council v ZZ (2020) EWHC 185 (Fam) |
Page length (in bytes) | 842 |
Page ID | 10642 |
Page content language | en - English |
Page content model | wikitext |
Indexing by robots | Allowed |
Number of redirects to this page | 0 |
Edit | Allow only users with "editing" permission (infinite) |
Move | Allow only users with "editing" permission (infinite) |
Page creator | Jonathan (talk | contribs) |
Date of page creation | 14:48, 2 April 2020 |
Latest editor | Jonathan (talk | contribs) |
Date of latest edit | 14:51, 2 April 2020 |
Total number of edits | 2 |
Total number of distinct authors | 1 |
Recent number of edits (within past 90 days) | 0 |
Recent number of distinct authors | 0 |
Description | Content |
Article description: (description ) This attribute controls the content of the description and og:description elements. | "It is impossible not to feel that X's life is one of nothing but suffering. As is set out in the cases above, life itself is precious and there is a very strong presumption in favour of preserving life. But X's life is a truly tragic one and certainly reaches a threshold of intolerability. ... His life expectancy is probably no more than a year on the basis of the literature. ... For all these reasons I am clear that it is not in X's best interests that he should be resuscitated or that he should be given life sustaining treatment." |