Information for "Re SF (2020) EWCOP 15"
Basic information
Display title | Re SF [2020] EWCOP 15 |
Default sort key | Re SF (2020) EWCOP 15 |
Page length (in bytes) | 1,303 |
Page ID | 10849 |
Page content language | en - English |
Page content model | wikitext |
Indexing by robots | Allowed |
Number of redirects to this page | 0 |
Counted as a content page | Yes |
Page image | ![]() |
Page protection
Edit | Allow only users with "editing" permission (infinite) |
Move | Allow only users with "editing" permission (infinite) |
Edit history
Page creator | Jonathan (talk | contribs) |
Date of page creation | 20:31, 18 July 2020 |
Latest editor | Jonathan (talk | contribs) |
Date of latest edit | 21:29, 6 June 2023 |
Total number of edits | 9 |
Total number of distinct authors | 1 |
Recent number of edits (within past 90 days) | 0 |
Recent number of distinct authors | 0 |
Page properties
SEO properties
Description | Content |
Article description: (description )This attribute controls the content of the description and og:description elements. | (1) SF lacked capacity in relation to some areas (litigation, care, residence, finances, tenancy, contact with strangers and people who are unfamiliar) but did have capacity to consent to sexual relations and to decide on contact with her husband. The psychiatric evidence was that SF would only have episodic memory ("memory for the personally experienced events of a person’s life, with retention of the details of time and situation in which they were acquired") in relation to contact with strangers, but would have semantic memory ("knowledge which is retained irrespective of the circumstances in which it was acquired [deriving] from the 'feeling' around the memory rather than the 'facts' surrounding the memory") in relation to her husband. (2) The court authorised the deprivation of liberty which existed both when living at her home and (on an interim basis until authorised by the placement) when receiving respite care at a residential supported care provision. |