Information for "Re NS (2016) NIFam 9"

Basic information

Display title	Re NS [2016] NIFam 9
Default sort key	Re NS (2016) NIFam 9
Page length (in bytes)	1,570
Page ID	8803
Page content language	en - English
Page content model	wikitext
Indexing by robots	Allowed
Number of redirects to this page	2
Counted as a content page	Yes

Edit	Allow only users with "editing" permission (infinite)
Move	Allow only users with "editing" permission (infinite)

Page creator	Jonathan (talk \| contribs)
Date of page creation	21:29, 23 February 2017
Latest editor	Jonathan (talk \| contribs)
Date of latest edit	13:48, 21 September 2021
Total number of edits	6
Total number of distinct authors	1
Recent number of edits (within past 90 days)	0
Recent number of distinct authors	0

Hidden categories (2)	This page is a member of 2 hidden categories: Category:Judgment available on Bailii Category:Pages using DynamicPageList3 parser function
Transcluded templates (10)	Templates used on this page: Template:Add drilldown link date (view source) Template:Add drilldown links (view source) Template:Add drilldown links ul (view source) Template:Case (view source) Template:Case subject note (view source) Template:Database header (view source) Template:Extension DPL (view source) Template:Linkless exists (view source) Template:Page creation date (view source) Template:What links here (view source)

Description	Content
Article description: (`description`) This attribute controls the content of the `description` and `og:description` elements.	"This case relates to an elderly lady, NS. She has been represented by the Official Solicitor (OS) throughout these proceedings. ... The case therefore first came to court when the Trust sought to place NS in a residential facility after the hospital admission in May 2016. This was at a time when a stay in hospital was no longer required. The issue in the case was really whether NS should be discharged to a residential facility or to the care of MS with a care package. ... This case therefore involves consideration of a number of questions which I summarise as follows: (i) Is the patient incapable of making a decision regarding the particular issue put before the court? (ii) If so is the plan/treatment proposed in the best interests of the patient? (iii) Is the intervention necessary and proportionate pursuant to Article 8 of the ECHR? (iv) If the plan involves a deprivation of liberty under Article 5 of the ECHR should that be authorised by the court and if so under what terms regarding duration and review?"

Information from Extension:WikiSEO