Holly.gif

Information for "Re JM (2016) EWCOP 15"

Basic information

Display titleRe JM [2016] EWCOP 15
Default sort keyRe JM (2016) EWCOP 15
Page length (in bytes)1,138
Page ID8503
Page content languageen - English
Page content modelwikitext
Indexing by robotsAllowed
Number of redirects to this page1
Counted as a content pageYes

Page protection

EditAllow only users with "editing" permission (infinite)
MoveAllow only users with "editing" permission (infinite)
View the protection log for this page.

Edit history

Page creatorJonathan (talk | contribs)
Date of page creation20:40, 31 August 2016
Latest editorJonathan (talk | contribs)
Date of latest edit13:33, 11 October 2021
Total number of edits5
Total number of distinct authors1
Recent number of edits (within past 90 days)0
Recent number of distinct authors0

Page properties

Hidden categories (2)

This page is a member of 2 hidden categories:

Transcluded templates (14)

Templates used on this page:

SEO properties

Description

Content

Article description: (description)
This attribute controls the content of the description and og:description elements.
"These five cases are examples of cases in which the procedure to be adopted by the Court of Protection (COP) was left open in my judgment in Re NRA (2015) EWCOP 59, (2015) MHLO 66. That judgment contains the references to the decision of the Supreme Court in Cheshire West and Chester Council v P (2014) UKSC 19 and of the President and the Court of Appeal in Re X (Court of Protection Practice) (2015) EWCA Civ 599, (2015) MHLO 44, which are the essential background to NRA. In short, the five cases were chosen as cases in which it was thought that there was no family member or friend who could be appointed as a Rule 3A representative. That is no longer the position in VE and my reference to the test cases in this judgment are to the remaining four."
Information from Extension:WikiSEO