| Display title | Re GK (Patient: Habeas Corpus) [1999] EWHC Admin 577 |
| Default sort key | Re GK (Patient: Habeas Corpus) (1999) EWHC Admin 577 |
| Page length (in bytes) | 925 |
| Page ID | 4531 |
| Page content language | en - English |
| Page content model | wikitext |
| Indexing by robots | Allowed |
| Number of redirects to this page | 4 |
| Counted as a content page | Yes |
| Edit | Allow only users with "editing" permission (infinite) |
| Move | Allow only users with "editing" permission (infinite) |
| Page creator | Jonathan (talk | contribs) |
| Date of page creation | 19:21, 11 April 2009 |
| Latest editor | Jonathan (talk | contribs) |
| Date of latest edit | 23:30, 9 December 2024 |
| Total number of edits | 10 |
| Total number of distinct authors | 1 |
| Recent number of edits (within past 90 days) | 3 |
| Recent number of distinct authors | 1 |
Description | Content |
Article description: (description)
This attribute controls the content of the description and og:description elements. | The nearest relative gave a discharge notice to the hospital receptionist, who put it in the MHA Administrator's pigeon hole; it was received by the administrator, on his return from work, more than 72 hours later. The High Court decided that the order was not served by "delivery of the order or notice at that hospital to an officer of the managers authorised by them to receive it" (as required by the regulations) until the MHA Administrator received it; therefore, the subsequent barring order was effective. |
