| Display title | Re AC and GC (Capacity: Hoarding: Best Interests) [2022] EWCOP 39 |
| Default sort key | Re AC and GC (Capacity: Hoarding: Best Interests) (2022) EWCOP 39 |
| Page length (in bytes) | 764 |
| Page ID | 14688 |
| Page content language | en - English |
| Page content model | wikitext |
| Indexing by robots | Allowed |
| Number of redirects to this page | 0 |
| Page image |  |
| Edit | Allow only users with "editing" permission (infinite) |
| Move | Allow only users with "editing" permission (infinite) |
| Page creator | Jonathan (talk | contribs) |
| Date of page creation | 16:36, 30 October 2022 |
| Latest editor | Jonathan (talk | contribs) |
| Date of latest edit | 13:24, 21 November 2022 |
| Total number of edits | 2 |
| Total number of distinct authors | 1 |
| Recent number of edits (within past 90 days) | 0 |
| Recent number of distinct authors | 0 |
Description | Content |
Article description: (description)
This attribute controls the content of the description and og:description elements. | The issue to be resolved was whether AC should return home for a trial period, receiving a package of care there. The parties and court agreed a 15-page statement of legal principles which is appended to the judgment, and agreed that information relevant to making decisions in respect of one’s items and belongings falls under these headings: (a) volume of belongings and impact on use of rooms; (b) safe access and use; (c) creation of hazards; (d) safety of building; (e) removal/disposal of hazardous levels of belongings. |
