Display title | R v Goldsmith [2024] EWCA Crim 780 |
Default sort key | R v Goldsmith (2024) EWCA Crim 780 |
Page length (in bytes) | 873 |
Page ID | 15862 |
Page content language | en - English |
Page content model | wikitext |
Indexing by robots | Allowed |
Number of redirects to this page | 0 |
Counted as a content page | Yes |
Edit | Allow only users with "editing" permission (infinite) |
Move | Allow only users with "editing" permission (infinite) |
Page creator | Jonathan (talk | contribs) |
Date of page creation | 12:56, 21 October 2024 |
Latest editor | Jonathan (talk | contribs) |
Date of latest edit | 21:02, 7 January 2025 |
Total number of edits | 2 |
Total number of distinct authors | 1 |
Recent number of edits (within past 90 days) | 1 |
Recent number of distinct authors | 1 |
Description | Content |
Article description: (description ) This attribute controls the content of the description and og:description elements. | The Court of Appeal had to decide whether, in a trial of the facts conducted under s4A CPIA 1964 relating to an offence of possession with intent to supply a controlled drug contrary to section 5(3) of the Misuse of Drugs Act 1971, a jury is obliged to consider only whether the defendant was in possession of the drugs in question, or whether it must also consider whether the defendant intended to supply them. |