Information for "R (Worcestershire County Council) v SSHSC (2021) EWCA Civ 1957"

Basic information

Display title	R (Worcestershire County Council) v SSHSC [2021] EWCA Civ 1957
Default sort key	R (Worcestershire County Council) v SSHSC (2021) EWCA Civ 1957
Page length (in bytes)	1,876
Page ID	14061
Page content language	en - English
Page content model	wikitext
Indexing by robots	Allowed
Number of redirects to this page	1
Counted as a content page	Yes

Edit	Allow only users with "editing" permission (infinite)
Move	Allow only users with "editing" permission (infinite)

Page creator	Jonathan (talk \| contribs)
Date of page creation	11:37, 12 January 2022
Latest editor	Jonathan (talk \| contribs)
Date of latest edit	20:03, 26 June 2023
Total number of edits	15
Total number of distinct authors	1
Recent number of edits (within past 90 days)	0
Recent number of distinct authors	0

Hidden categories (2)	This page is a member of 2 hidden categories: Category:Judgment available on Bailii Category:Pages using DynamicPageList3 parser function
Transcluded templates (16)	Templates used on this page: Template:Add drilldown link date (view source) Template:Add drilldown links (view source) Template:Add drilldown links ul (view source) Template:Case (view source) Template:Case subject note (view source) Template:Convert brackets (view source) Template:Database header (view source) Template:Extension DPL (view source) Template:ICLR (view source) Template:Judicial history (view source) Template:Link (view source) Template:Linkless exists (view source) Template:Page creation date (view source) Template:Rsum (view source) Template:What links here (view source) Text:ICLR (2022) WLR(D) 14 (view source)

Description	Content
Article description: (`description`) This attribute controls the content of the `description` and `og:description` elements.	JG was detained under s3 in Worcestershire (Area 1), discharged to residential care in Swindon (Area 2), detained again under s3 in Swindon and discharged again. The Court of Appeal held that: (1) Area 1's duty subsists until it comes to an end by a s117(2) decision that the patient "is no longer in need" of aftercare services (ordinary residence in area 2 when subsequently detained makes no difference); there had been no such decision so the duty continued throughout both the second period of detention and beyond. (2) Obiter, by the ordinary meaning of "ordinarily resident" and under the Shah test JG was ordinarily resident in Swindon immediately before the second detention, and there was nothing in subsequent caselaw (including Cornwall) or the Care Act 2014 amendments (including the change from "resident" to "ordinarily resident") justifying a different conclusion.

Information from Extension:WikiSEO