Holly.gif

Information for "R (BG) v Suffolk County Council (2022) EWCA Civ 1047"

Basic information

Display titleR (BG) v Suffolk County Council [2022] EWCA Civ 1047
Default sort keyR (BG) v Suffolk County Council (2022) EWCA Civ 1047
Page length (in bytes)891
Page ID14507
Page content languageen - English
Page content modelwikitext
Indexing by robotsAllowed
Number of redirects to this page0
Counted as a content pageYes

Page protection

EditAllow only users with "editing" permission (infinite)
MoveAllow only users with "editing" permission (infinite)
View the protection log for this page.

Edit history

Page creatorJonathan (talk | contribs)
Date of page creation20:28, 4 August 2022
Latest editorJonathan (talk | contribs)
Date of latest edit20:33, 4 August 2022
Total number of edits4
Total number of distinct authors1
Recent number of edits (within past 90 days)0
Recent number of distinct authors0

Page properties

Hidden categories (2)

This page is a member of 2 hidden categories:

Transcluded templates (14)

Templates used on this page:

SEO properties

Description

Content

Article description: (description)
This attribute controls the content of the description and og:description elements.
The council had decided no longer to fund the family holidays of BG and KG (who have autism and learning disability) on the basis that it was no longer including holiday travel and accommodation costs in personal budgets. The High Court quashed this decision, holding that the council had the power to provide financial support for recreational activity and holidays under section 18 Care Act 2014, and ordered a fresh needs assessment. The council appealed but was unsuccessful.
Information from Extension:WikiSEO