Information for "PM v Midlands Partnership NHS Foundation Trust (2020) UKUT 69 (AAC)"
Basic information
| Display title | PM v Midlands Partnership NHS Foundation Trust [2020] UKUT 69 (AAC) |
| Default sort key | PM v Midlands Partnership NHS Foundation Trust (2020) UKUT 69 (AAC) |
| Page length (in bytes) | 3,851 |
| Page ID | 10634 |
| Page content language | en - English |
| Page content model | wikitext |
| Indexing by robots | Allowed |
| Number of redirects to this page | 0 |
| Counted as a content page | Yes |
| Page image |  |
Page protection
| Edit | Allow only users with "editing" permission (infinite) |
| Move | Allow only users with "editing" permission (infinite) |
Edit history
| Page creator | Jonathan (talk | contribs) |
| Date of page creation | 21:30, 1 April 2020 |
| Latest editor | Jonathan (talk | contribs) |
| Date of latest edit | 12:47, 22 October 2024 |
| Total number of edits | 13 |
| Total number of distinct authors | 1 |
| Recent number of edits (within past 90 days) | 0 |
| Recent number of distinct authors | 0 |
Page properties
SEO properties
Description | Content |
Article description: (description)This attribute controls the content of the description and og:description elements. | The tribunal had been wrong to find that appropriate medical treatment was "available" for a CTO patient for whom the lack of a SOAD certificate meant that two days after the hearing her treatment could not lawfully be given (unless she were to be recalled to hospital and the administration of her depot were to become immediately necessary). This was the case even though the treatment could have been given on the hearing date: the tribunal should look at the whole course of treatment, not merely a snapshot. |