| Display title | NHS Tameside and Glossop CCG v CR [2021] EWCOP 19 |
| Default sort key | NHS Tameside and Glossop CCG v CR (2021) EWCOP 19 |
| Page length (in bytes) | 670 |
| Page ID | 12641 |
| Page content language | en - English |
| Page content model | wikitext |
| Indexing by robots | Allowed |
| Number of redirects to this page | 0 |
| Counted as a content page | Yes |
| Edit | Allow only users with "editing" permission (infinite) |
| Move | Allow only users with "editing" permission (infinite) |
| Page creator | Jonathan (talk | contribs) |
| Date of page creation | 22:41, 11 April 2021 |
| Latest editor | Jonathan (talk | contribs) |
| Date of latest edit | 09:28, 10 January 2022 |
| Total number of edits | 4 |
| Total number of distinct authors | 1 |
| Recent number of edits (within past 90 days) | 0 |
| Recent number of distinct authors | 0 |
Description | Content |
Article description: (description)
This attribute controls the content of the description and og:description elements. | CR lacked capacity in relation to the coronavirus vaccination and it was not possible to determine his wishes and feelings. The Court of Protection decided it was in his best interests to have the vaccination, based on the orthodox view of its benefits, and rejecting family members' objections. The relief sought by the CCG was granted, although physical intervention was not authorised. |
