| Display title | Manchester University NHS Foundation Trust v JS [2023] EWCOP 33 |
| Default sort key | Manchester University NHS Foundation Trust v JS (2023) EWCOP 33 |
| Page length (in bytes) | 883 |
| Page ID | 15550 |
| Page content language | en - English |
| Page content model | wikitext |
| Indexing by robots | Allowed |
| Number of redirects to this page | 0 |
| Counted as a content page | Yes |
| Page image |  |
| Edit | Allow only users with "editing" permission (infinite) |
| Move | Allow only users with "editing" permission (infinite) |
| Page creator | Jonathan (talk | contribs) |
| Date of page creation | 17:52, 9 April 2024 |
| Latest editor | Jonathan (talk | contribs) |
| Date of latest edit | 10:10, 7 October 2024 |
| Total number of edits | 4 |
| Total number of distinct authors | 1 |
| Recent number of edits (within past 90 days) | 0 |
| Recent number of distinct authors | 0 |
Description | Content |
Article description: (description)
This attribute controls the content of the description and og:description elements. | The parties agreed that the key questions when considering ineligiblity under Case E are: (1) Is the person a 'mental health patient'? (2) Is the person an 'objecting' mental health patient? (3) Could the person be detained under s2 or 3 MHA 1983? The judge (in this appeal judgment) agreed that they provide a useful structure for practitioners, and decided that the first instance judge had been entitled to reach the conclusions he did on the evidence he had. |