Information for "MacPherson v Sunderland City Council (2024) EWCA Civ 1579"

Basic information

Display titleMacPherson v Sunderland City Council [2024] EWCA Civ 1579
Default sort keyMacPherson v Sunderland City Council (2024) EWCA Civ 1579
Page length (in bytes)1,115
Page ID16108
Page content languageen - English
Page content modelwikitext
Indexing by robotsAllowed
Number of redirects to this page0
Counted as a content pageYes

Page protection

EditAllow only users with "editing" permission (infinite)
MoveAllow only users with "editing" permission (infinite)
View the protection log for this page.

Edit history

Page creatorJonathan (talk | contribs)
Date of page creation22:39, 15 January 2025
Latest editorJonathan (talk | contribs)
Date of latest edit22:39, 15 January 2025
Total number of edits1
Total number of distinct authors1
Recent number of edits (within past 90 days)1
Recent number of distinct authors1

Page properties

Hidden categories (2)

This page is a member of 2 hidden categories:

Transcluded templates (11)

Templates used on this page:

SEO properties

Description

Content

Article description: (description)
This attribute controls the content of the description and og:description elements.
There was reason to believe (under MCA 2005 s48) that the appellant lacked capacity in relation to this appeal against a committal order. The Court of Appeal has all the powers of a lower court (whether that be the Court of Protection or otherwise) in relation to an appeal so it can make an interim declaration and refer any issue for determination by that lower court. The questions of the appellant's current capacity, and her capacity when sentenced, were referred to a Tier 3 COP judge for determination, after which the Court of Appeal will hear the case again. The stay of the sentence of imprisonment was continued, the bench warrant was discharged, and the appeal was adjourned, but the injunctions remained in force.
Information from Extension:WikiSEO