Information for "MM v WL Clinic (2016) UKUT 37 (AAC)"
Basic information
| Display title | MM v WL Clinic [2016] UKUT 37 (AAC) |
| Default sort key | MM v WL Clinic (2016) UKUT 37 (AAC) |
| Page length (in bytes) | 1,763 |
| Page ID | 8380 |
| Page content language | en - English |
| Page content model | wikitext |
| Indexing by robots | Allowed |
| Number of redirects to this page | 1 |
| Counted as a content page | Yes |
Page protection
| Edit | Allow only users with "editing" permission (infinite) |
| Move | Allow only users with "editing" permission (infinite) |
Edit history
| Page creator | Jonathan (talk | contribs) |
| Date of page creation | 00:16, 28 January 2016 |
| Latest editor | Jonathan (talk | contribs) |
| Date of latest edit | 11:55, 8 October 2021 |
| Total number of edits | 19 |
| Total number of distinct authors | 1 |
| Recent number of edits (within past 90 days) | 0 |
| Recent number of distinct authors | 0 |
Page properties
SEO properties
Description | Content |
Article description: (description)This attribute controls the content of the description and og:description elements. | Charles J refused permission to appeal his earlier decision (the main point of which was that, for the purposes of Article 5, a restricted patient with the capacity to do so can give a valid and effective consent to conditions of a conditional discharge that when implemented will, on an objective assessment, create a deprivation of liberty). The Secretary of State can seek permission from the Court of Appeal [and subsequently did]. |