Information for "LBX v K, L and M (2013) EWHC 4170 (Fam)"

Basic information

Display title	LBX v K, L and M [2013] EWHC 4170 (Fam)
Default sort key	LBX v K, L and M (2013) EWHC 4170 (Fam)
Page length (in bytes)	1,711
Page ID	7795
Page content language	en - English
Page content model	wikitext
Indexing by robots	Allowed
Number of redirects to this page	1
Counted as a content page	Yes
Page image

Edit	Allow only users with "editing" permission (infinite)
Move	Allow only users with "editing" permission (infinite)

Page creator	Jonathan (talk \| contribs)
Date of page creation	13:39, 7 August 2014
Latest editor	Jonathan (talk \| contribs)
Date of latest edit	22:50, 27 July 2023
Total number of edits	9
Total number of distinct authors	1
Recent number of edits (within past 90 days)	0
Recent number of distinct authors	0

Hidden categories (3)	This page is a member of 3 hidden categories: Category:Judgment available on Bailii Category:Judgment available on MHLO Category:Pages using DynamicPageList3 parser function
Transcluded templates (16)	Templates used on this page: Template:Add drilldown link date (view source) Template:Add drilldown links (view source) Template:Add drilldown links ul (view source) Template:Case (view source) Template:Case subject note (view source) Template:Contributor (view source) Template:Database header (view source) Template:Essex issue page (view source) Template:Essex issue to pagelink (view source) Template:Extension DPL (view source) Template:Judicial history (view source) Template:Linkless exists (view source) Template:Page creation date (view source) Template:Swap names from commas (view source) Template:Thanks (view source) Template:What links here (view source)

Description	Content
Article description: (`description`) This attribute controls the content of the `description` and `og:description` elements.	"In the judgment I handed down this morning I concluded that L has capacity in relation to decisions about where he should live, the care he receives and contact with his family. Having made that decision I then considered the question as to whether I should invoke the inherent jurisdiction as L was a vulnerable adult. ... I accept this is a difficult balance but, in this case, I am entirely satisfied that because of the vulnerability that this particular person has, and the very clear psychiatric evidence dating back to Dr. Halstead's report in 2007, endorsed by the various witnesses that gave evidence earlier this week, that he remains vulnerable to overwhelming emotional issues which could compromise his capacity. He needs to be able to retain his capacity in circumstances where he has emotional safety. That can only be where there is a proportionate structure in place that enables him to be able to maintain his capacity in a relatively calm environment, and free from the emotional maelstrom, as I have described it, resulting from the relationship that he has with his father in particular, and the relationship the father has with those who support L in the care that he has."

Information from Extension:WikiSEO