Information for "Hill Dickinson, 'Court of Protection' (January 2022)"
Basic information
Display title | Hill Dickinson, 'Court of Protection' (January 2022) |
Default sort key | Hill Dickinson, 'Court of Protection' (January 2022) |
Page length (in bytes) | 820 |
Page ID | 14079 |
Page content language | en - English |
Page content model | wikitext |
Indexing by robots | Allowed |
Number of redirects to this page | 0 |
Page image | ![]() |
Page protection
Edit | Allow only users with "editing" permission (infinite) |
Move | Allow only users with "editing" permission (infinite) |
Edit history
Page creator | Jonathan (talk | contribs) |
Date of page creation | 18:38, 3 February 2022 |
Latest editor | Jonathan (talk | contribs) |
Date of latest edit | 21:59, 27 March 2023 |
Total number of edits | 3 |
Total number of distinct authors | 1 |
Recent number of edits (within past 90 days) | 0 |
Recent number of distinct authors | 0 |
Page properties
Transcluded templates (8) | Templates used on this page:
|
SEO properties
Description | Content |
Article description: (description )This attribute controls the content of the description and og:description elements. | The articles are: (1) Capacity to Engage in Sex vs Capacity to Consent: The Supreme Court’s decision in JB; (2) Caesarean sections and contingent declarations; (3) The role of mediation; (4) Lessons to be learnt from withdrawal of care decision; (5) Jehovah’s Witness: Validity of an Advance Decision; (6) Court of Protection cases from October to December 2021; (7) Contact and coercive control; (8) P's right to have sex with a sex worker: the Court of Appeal’s decision. |