Information for "GUP v EUP (2024) EWCOP 3"
Basic information
| Display title | GUP v EUP [2024] EWCOP 3 |
| Default sort key | GUP v EUP (2024) EWCOP 3 |
| Page length (in bytes) | 744 |
| Page ID | 16050 |
| Page content language | en - English |
| Page content model | wikitext |
| Indexing by robots | Allowed |
| Number of redirects to this page | 0 |
| Counted as a content page | Yes |
| Page image |  |
Page protection
| Edit | Allow only users with "editing" permission (infinite) |
| Move | Allow only users with "editing" permission (infinite) |
Edit history
| Page creator | Jonathan (talk | contribs) |
| Date of page creation | 22:02, 6 December 2024 |
| Latest editor | Jonathan (talk | contribs) |
| Date of latest edit | 22:02, 6 December 2024 |
| Total number of edits | 1 |
| Total number of distinct authors | 1 |
| Recent number of edits (within past 90 days) | 0 |
| Recent number of distinct authors | 0 |
Page properties
SEO properties
Description | Content |
Article description: (description)This attribute controls the content of the description and og:description elements. | (1) Neither provision of nutrition nor hydration was in EUP's best interests. (2) The family had disagreed with the trust's palliative care plan but the trust, citing legal advice likely grounded on its belief that further treatment would be unethical, did not make an application to court. The judge criticised the trust for not following his guidance in Practice Guidance (Court of Protection: Serious Medical Treatment) (2020) EWCOP 2. |