Information for "Cannon v Bar Standards Board (2023) EWCA Civ 278"

Basic information

Display titleCannon v Bar Standards Board [2023] EWCA Civ 278
Default sort keyCannon v Bar Standards Board (2023) EWCA Civ 278
Page length (in bytes)743
Page ID14973
Page content languageen - English
Page content modelwikitext
Indexing by robotsAllowed
Number of redirects to this page0

Page protection

EditAllow only users with "editing" permission (infinite)
MoveAllow only users with "editing" permission (infinite)
View the protection log for this page.

Edit history

Page creatorJonathan (talk | contribs)
Date of page creation22:06, 17 March 2023
Latest editorJonathan (talk | contribs)
Date of latest edit22:06, 17 March 2023
Total number of edits1
Total number of distinct authors1
Recent number of edits (within past 90 days)0
Recent number of distinct authors0

Page properties

Hidden categories (2)

This page is a member of 2 hidden categories:

Transcluded templates (10)

Templates used on this page:

SEO properties

Description

Content

Article description: (description)
This attribute controls the content of the description and og:description elements.
The appellant had been disbarred for professional misconduct. In the Court of Appeal she argued that she had lacked mental capacity to participate in the Bar Disciplinary Tribunal proceedings and to give instructions in relation to her appeal to the High Court, and she sought permission to adduce psychiatric and other evidence which had not been before the court below. Permission to appeal was refused on this and other grounds.
Information from Extension:WikiSEO