Holly.gif

Information for "Calderdale MBC v AB (2021) EWCOP 56"

Basic information

Display titleCalderdale MBC v AB [2021] EWCOP 56
Default sort keyCalderdale MBC v AB (2021) EWCOP 56
Page length (in bytes)611
Page ID13956
Page content languageen - English
Page content modelwikitext
Indexing by robotsAllowed
Number of redirects to this page0
Counted as a content pageYes
Page imageEssex newsletter 117.pdf

Page protection

EditAllow only users with "editing" permission (infinite)
MoveAllow only users with "editing" permission (infinite)
View the protection log for this page.

Edit history

Page creatorJonathan (talk | contribs)
Date of page creation21:20, 2 November 2021
Latest editorJonathan (talk | contribs)
Date of latest edit16:28, 21 February 2022
Total number of edits3
Total number of distinct authors1
Recent number of edits (within past 90 days)0
Recent number of distinct authors0

Page properties

Hidden categories (2)

This page is a member of 2 hidden categories:

Transcluded templates (13)

Templates used on this page:

SEO properties

Description

Content

Article description: (description)
This attribute controls the content of the description and og:description elements.
The judge agreed with the local authority's uncontested position that the authority granted by the standard property and affairs deputyship order did not make the deputy an 'authorised person' for the purposes of s32(4)(a) Care Act 2014 ('Adults without capacity to request direct payments').
Information from Extension:WikiSEO