Display title | Calderdale MBC v AB [2021] EWCOP 56 |
Default sort key | Calderdale MBC v AB (2021) EWCOP 56 |
Page length (in bytes) | 611 |
Page ID | 13956 |
Page content language | en - English |
Page content model | wikitext |
Indexing by robots | Allowed |
Number of redirects to this page | 0 |
Counted as a content page | Yes |
Page image | |
Edit | Allow only users with "editing" permission (infinite) |
Move | Allow only users with "editing" permission (infinite) |
Page creator | Jonathan (talk | contribs) |
Date of page creation | 21:20, 2 November 2021 |
Latest editor | Jonathan (talk | contribs) |
Date of latest edit | 16:28, 21 February 2022 |
Total number of edits | 3 |
Total number of distinct authors | 1 |
Recent number of edits (within past 90 days) | 0 |
Recent number of distinct authors | 0 |
Description | Content |
Article description: (description ) This attribute controls the content of the description and og:description elements. | The judge agreed with the local authority's uncontested position that the authority granted by the standard property and affairs deputyship order did not make the deputy an 'authorised person' for the purposes of s32(4)(a) Care Act 2014 ('Adults without capacity to request direct payments'). |