Information for "CT v London Borough of Lambeth (2025) EWCOP 6 (T3)"

Basic information

Display titleCT v London Borough of Lambeth [2025] EWCOP 6 (T3)
Default sort keyCT v London Borough of Lambeth (2025) EWCOP 6 (T3)
Page length (in bytes)3,734
Page ID16234
Page content languageen - English
Page content modelwikitext
Indexing by robotsAllowed
Number of redirects to this page0
Counted as a content pageYes

Page protection

EditAllow only users with "editing" permission (infinite)
MoveAllow only users with "editing" permission (infinite)
View the protection log for this page.

Edit history

Page creatorJonathan (talk | contribs)
Date of page creation12:43, 13 February 2025
Latest editorJonathan (talk | contribs)
Date of latest edit21:49, 19 February 2025
Total number of edits2
Total number of distinct authors1
Recent number of edits (within past 90 days)2
Recent number of distinct authors1

Page properties

Hidden categories (2)

This page is a member of 2 hidden categories:

Transcluded templates (14)

Templates used on this page:

SEO properties

Description

Content

Article description: (description)
This attribute controls the content of the description and og:description elements.
(1) The first instance judge had erred by including knowledge of the patient CT's psychiatric diagnoses and their consequences in the list of relevant information, as such an "insight" requirement is circular and risks leading inevitably to the conclusion that the patient lacks capacity; (2) that approach wrongly failed to delay consideration of mental impairment until after the functional assessment; (3) the judge had not properly taken into account recent evidence that CT had insight into his increasing frailty. The appeal judge added to the "growing industry of checklists" with 10 points to assist those assessing capacity.
Information from Extension:WikiSEO