Display title | CB v SSWP [2020] UKUT 15 (AAC) |
Default sort key | CB v SSWP (2020) UKUT 15 (AAC) |
Page length (in bytes) | 1,377 |
Page ID | 10664 |
Page content language | en - English |
Page content model | wikitext |
Indexing by robots | Allowed |
Number of redirects to this page | 0 |
Counted as a content page | Yes |
Edit | Allow only users with "editing" permission (infinite) |
Move | Allow only users with "editing" permission (infinite) |
Page creator | Jonathan (talk | contribs) |
Date of page creation | 14:47, 14 April 2020 |
Latest editor | Jonathan (talk | contribs) |
Date of latest edit | 11:55, 8 October 2021 |
Total number of edits | 5 |
Total number of distinct authors | 1 |
Recent number of edits (within past 90 days) | 0 |
Recent number of distinct authors | 0 |
Description | Content |
Article description: (description ) This attribute controls the content of the description and og:description elements. | (1) It was unlawful of the tribunal to hear the ESA appeal in the applicant's absence; the decision was set aside and the case remitted to a new panel. (2) The judgment contains obiter comments about the request for an all-female panel. |