Information for "Al-Jeffery v Al-Jeffery (Vulnerable adult: British citizen) (2016) EWHC 2151 (Fam)"
Basic information
| Display title | Al-Jeffery v Al-Jeffery (Vulnerable adult: British citizen) [2016] EWHC 2151 (Fam) |
| Default sort key | Al-Jeffery v Al-Jeffery (Vulnerable adult: British citizen) (2016) EWHC 2151 (Fam) |
| Page length (in bytes) | 1,670 |
| Page ID | 8480 |
| Page content language | en - English |
| Page content model | wikitext |
| Indexing by robots | Allowed |
| Number of redirects to this page | 1 |
| Counted as a content page | Yes |
Page protection
| Edit | Allow only users with "editing" permission (infinite) |
| Move | Allow only users with "editing" permission (infinite) |
Edit history
| Page creator | Jonathan (talk | contribs) |
| Date of page creation | 09:09, 27 August 2016 |
| Latest editor | Jonathan (talk | contribs) |
| Date of latest edit | 11:35, 2 April 2025 |
| Total number of edits | 8 |
| Total number of distinct authors | 1 |
| Recent number of edits (within past 90 days) | 3 |
| Recent number of distinct authors | 1 |
Page properties
| Transcluded templates (10) | Templates used on this page:
|
SEO properties
Description | Content |
Article description: (description)This attribute controls the content of the description and og:description elements. | "There are two applications before the court. One asks the court to make a statutory forced marriage protection order. The other asks the court to make orders, including mandatory orders, in the exercise of the inherent jurisdiction of the High Court to make orders protective of vulnerable adults. ... She now claims that she is being seriously ill-treated by her father and being kept under constraint by him in his flat; and that she is being prevented by him from leaving Saudi Arabia and travelling to Wales or England, which she wishes to do, and is, in the eyes of the law of Wales and England, fully entitled freely to do. ... The father, against whom I [am] asked to make an order, is not a British citizen and owes no allegiance to our Sovereign or this state. Neither of them are present here. Neither of them have lived here for several years. Both of them are citizens of Saudi Arabia and both of them currently live there. There have, indeed, already been recent legal proceedings between them there. Should I, nevertheless, attempt to help her by making the essential order which she seeks for her return here; or should I appreciate that that would be exorbitant and, in my judicial discretion, decline to do so? That is the essential issue and dilemma in this case." |