Information for "A local Authority v P and CCG (2021) EWCOP 48"
Basic information
| Display title | A local Authority v P and CCG [2021] EWCOP 48 |
| Default sort key | A local Authority v P and CCG (2021) EWCOP 48 |
| Page length (in bytes) | 858 |
| Page ID | 13431 |
| Page content language | en - English |
| Page content model | wikitext |
| Indexing by robots | Allowed |
| Number of redirects to this page | 0 |
Page protection
| Edit | Allow only users with "editing" permission (infinite) |
| Move | Allow only users with "editing" permission (infinite) |
Edit history
| Page creator | Jonathan (talk | contribs) |
| Date of page creation | 20:36, 12 September 2021 |
| Latest editor | Jonathan (talk | contribs) |
| Date of latest edit | 21:29, 6 June 2023 |
| Total number of edits | 3 |
| Total number of distinct authors | 1 |
| Recent number of edits (within past 90 days) | 0 |
| Recent number of distinct authors | 0 |
Page properties
SEO properties
Description | Content |
Article description: (description)This attribute controls the content of the description and og:description elements. | P had capacity in relation to sex, but lacked capacity in relation to litigation, residence, care and contact. The judge's letter to P included the following explanation: "Sex is a part of contact with other people but in law considered separately. Everyone was prepared to agree you could understand what decisions you and the person you have sex with have to take. However the decision about who is a person who you can trust enough to have sex with is a decision about contact and the evidence shows me that this is something you do not have understanding about." |