| Display title | 39 Essex Street, 'Court of Protection update' (issue 16, December 2011) |
| Default sort key | 39 Essex Street, 'Court of Protection update' (issue 16, December 2011) |
| Page length (in bytes) | 1,058 |
| Page ID | 13307 |
| Page content language | en - English |
| Page content model | wikitext |
| Indexing by robots | Allowed |
| Number of redirects to this page | 0 |
| Counted as a content page | Yes |
| Page image |  |
| Edit | Allow only users with "editing" permission (infinite) |
| Move | Allow only users with "editing" permission (infinite) |
| Page creator | Jonathan (talk | contribs) |
| Date of page creation | 19:48, 24 June 2021 |
| Latest editor | Jonathan (talk | contribs) |
| Date of latest edit | 22:12, 19 March 2023 |
| Total number of edits | 3 |
| Total number of distinct authors | 1 |
| Recent number of edits (within past 90 days) | 0 |
| Recent number of distinct authors | 0 |
Description | Content |
Article description: (description)
This attribute controls the content of the description and og:description elements. | The cases mentioned in this issue are: Re RK; RK v BCC (2011) EWCA Civ 1305, Cheshire West and Chester Council v P (2011) EWCA Civ 1333, Re RB (Adult); A London Borough v RB (Adult) (No 4) (2011) EWHC 3017 (Fam), Re FL; HN v FL and Hampshire CC (2011) EWHC 2894 (COP), R v Heaney (2011) EWCA Crim 2682, Re HM; SM v HM (2011) COP 11875043 4/11/11, De Louville De Toucy v Bonhams 1793 Ltd (2011) EWHC 3809 (Ch). Also included are: (1) the Court of Protection (Amendment) Rules 2011 (authorised court officers); (2) minor amendments to Practice Directions 10A, 14B and 19A (contact details); (3) Statistics on permission applications; (4) comment on the Cheshire judgment by a BIA. |