Information for "39 Essex Chambers, 'Mental Capacity Report' (issue 99, November 2019)"
Basic information
Display title | 39 Essex Chambers, 'Mental Capacity Report' (issue 99, November 2019) |
Default sort key | 39 Essex Chambers, 'Mental Capacity Report' (issue 99, November 2019) |
Page length (in bytes) | 1,643 |
Page ID | 11069 |
Page content language | en - English |
Page content model | wikitext |
Indexing by robots | Allowed |
Number of redirects to this page | 0 |
Page image | ![]() |
Page protection
Edit | Allow only users with "editing" permission (infinite) |
Move | Allow only users with "editing" permission (infinite) |
Edit history
Page creator | Jonathan (talk | contribs) |
Date of page creation | 21:22, 15 September 2020 |
Latest editor | Jonathan (talk | contribs) |
Date of latest edit | 22:10, 19 March 2023 |
Total number of edits | 3 |
Total number of distinct authors | 1 |
Recent number of edits (within past 90 days) | 0 |
Recent number of distinct authors | 0 |
Page properties
Transcluded templates (8) | Templates used on this page:
|
SEO properties
Description | Content |
Article description: (description )This attribute controls the content of the description and og:description elements. | "Highlights this month include: (1) In the Health, Welfare and Deprivation of Liberty Report: two deprivation of liberty cases making clear what should (and should not) happen before the court; two important cases about reproductive rights and capacity, and capacity under stress in different contexts; (2) In the Property and Affairs Report: welcome clarity as to how to make foreign powers of representation effective; and capacity and the financial implications of marriage; (3) In the Practice and Procedure Report: two important judgments from the Vice-President highlighting different aspects of case management and confirmation as to the procedural rules governing inherent jurisdiction applications in relation to adults; (4) In the Wider Context Report: news from the National Mental Capacity Forum (and a survey they need completing); an important case about the intersection of capacity, the inherent jurisdiction and the Mental Health Act 1983 in the context of force-feeding; and when you can rely upon your own incapacity to your benefit; (5) In the Scotland Report: four important publications from the Mental Welfare Commission." |