| Display title | 39 Essex Chambers, 'Mental Capacity Report' (issue 81, November 2017) |
| Default sort key | 39 Essex Chambers, 'Mental Capacity Report' (issue 81, November 2017) |
| Page length (in bytes) | 1,320 |
| Page ID | 13066 |
| Page content language | en - English |
| Page content model | wikitext |
| Indexing by robots | Allowed |
| Number of redirects to this page | 0 |
| Counted as a content page | Yes |
| Page image |  |
| Edit | Allow only users with "editing" permission (infinite) |
| Move | Allow only users with "editing" permission (infinite) |
| Page creator | Jonathan (talk | contribs) |
| Date of page creation | 07:52, 3 May 2021 |
| Latest editor | Jonathan (talk | contribs) |
| Date of latest edit | 23:03, 19 March 2023 |
| Total number of edits | 6 |
| Total number of distinct authors | 1 |
| Recent number of edits (within past 90 days) | 0 |
| Recent number of distinct authors | 0 |
Description | Content |
Article description: (description)
This attribute controls the content of the description and og:description elements. | "(1) In the Health, Welfare and Deprivation of Liberty Report: the Court of Appeal considers parental consent to confinement, CANH withdrawal and the courts, and the latest DOLS figures; (2) In the Property and Affairs Report: personal injury payouts and s.117 MHA 1983, calling in bonds and court approval of compromises through a human rights lens; (2) In the Practice and Procedure Report: the Court of Protection Rules 2017 and what we can learn from the new Family Procedure Rules and PD concerning vulnerable witnesses; (3) In the Wider Context Report: re-framing Gillick competence through MCA eyes, MHA changes coming into force, and CRPD developments and resources; (4) In the Scotland Report: critical comments on practice rules, counter-proposals for guardians and parental consent to confinement from a Scottish perspective;" |