Information for "39 Essex Chambers, 'Mental Capacity Law Newsletter' (issue 47, June 2014)"
Basic information
Display title | 39 Essex Chambers, 'Mental Capacity Law Newsletter' (issue 47, June 2014) |
Default sort key | 39 Essex Chambers, 'Mental Capacity Law Newsletter' (issue 47, June 2014) |
Page length (in bytes) | 1,491 |
Page ID | 13112 |
Page content language | en - English |
Page content model | wikitext |
Indexing by robots | Allowed |
Number of redirects to this page | 0 |
Page image | ![]() |
Page protection
Edit | Allow only users with "editing" permission (infinite) |
Move | Allow only users with "editing" permission (infinite) |
Edit history
Page creator | Jonathan (talk | contribs) |
Date of page creation | 13:59, 6 May 2021 |
Latest editor | Jonathan (talk | contribs) |
Date of latest edit | 22:59, 19 March 2023 |
Total number of edits | 5 |
Total number of distinct authors | 1 |
Recent number of edits (within past 90 days) | 0 |
Recent number of distinct authors | 0 |
Page properties
Transcluded templates (8) | Templates used on this page:
|
SEO properties
Description | Content |
Article description: (description )This attribute controls the content of the description and og:description elements. | "Highlights this month include: (1) In the Health, Welfare and Deprivation of Liberty Newsletter: the Court of Appeal revisits capacity (and the role of precedent); prohibiting contact; and advance decisions to refuse treatment; (2) In the Property and Affairs Newsletter: the sequel to the infamous Rolex case; (3) In the Practice and Procedure Newsletter: a rare award of costs in welfare proceedings; the proper place of the press in CoP proceedings; revisiting decisions on appeal; judicial contact with the subject of proceedings; joint instruction of experts in publicly funded cases, and a plea for assistance with streamlining directions hearings; (4) In the Capacity outside the COP newsletter: two important cases involving capacity and children and two book reviews; (5) In the Scotland Newsletter: a vitally important decision of Sheriff John Baird which casts significant doubt upon the validity of very many powers of attorney entered into in Scotland and upon the standard template available on the Scots OPG website." |