Information for "39 Essex Chambers, 'Mental Capacity Law Newsletter' (issue 42, February 2014)"

Basic information

Display title39 Essex Chambers, 'Mental Capacity Law Newsletter' (issue 42, February 2014)
Default sort key39 Essex Chambers, 'Mental Capacity Law Newsletter' (issue 42, February 2014)
Page length (in bytes)1,474
Page ID13221
Page content languageen - English
Page content modelwikitext
Indexing by robotsAllowed
Number of redirects to this page0
Page imageEssex newsletter 42.pdf

Page protection

EditAllow only users with "editing" permission (infinite)
MoveAllow only users with "editing" permission (infinite)
View the protection log for this page.

Edit history

Page creatorJonathan (talk | contribs)
Date of page creation12:12, 27 May 2021
Latest editorJonathan (talk | contribs)
Date of latest edit22:10, 19 March 2023
Total number of edits6
Total number of distinct authors1
Recent number of edits (within past 90 days)0
Recent number of distinct authors0

Page properties

Hidden categories (2)

This page is a member of 2 hidden categories:

Transcluded templates (8)

Templates used on this page:

SEO properties

Description

Content

Article description: (description)
This attribute controls the content of the description and og:description elements.
"From England, undoubtedly the most important decision is that of the Court of Appeal in IM v LM, AB and Liverpool City Council, providing the first answer at appellate level to the very vexed question of whether capacity to consent to sexual relations is person- or act-specific. The decision in RC v CC is of considerable significance for its authoritative discussion of the principles governing non-disclosure in the Court of Protection. The decision in Re UF, trailed last month, provides important guidance as to the circumstances under which it is appropriate for a family member to act as litigation friend for P, along with recording significant concessions from the Ministry of Justice as to public funding in cases under s.21A MCA 2005. We also cover cases on the scope of s7 MCA 2005 (‘necessaries’), ‘enforced’ Caesarean sections, DNACPR notices, important guidance from the President upon the publication of judgments, and the CQC’s most recent report upon the operation of the DOLS safeguards."
Information from Extension:WikiSEO