MM v WL Clinic [2015] UKUT 644 (AAC)

Revision as of 20:58, 26 November 2015 by Jonathan (talk | contribs) (Created page with "''(1) For the purposes of Article 5, a restricted patient with the capacity to do so can give a valid and effective consent to conditions of a conditional discharge that w...")
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)

(1) For the purposes of Article 5, a restricted patient with the capacity to do so can give a valid and effective consent to conditions of a conditional discharge that when implemented will, on an objective assessment, create a deprivation of liberty. (2) In determining whether to discharge conditionally, the tribunal has to consider whether the consent is freely given and (as raised in KC at [134-139] consider any practical problems arising from the ability to withdraw consent. (3) MM's case was remitted to the First-tier Tribunal with a direction that it apply the decisions in KC and this case.

External link

...