Flag of England.gif

Re D (A Child) (2019) UKSC 42: Difference between revisions

(Created page with "{{Case |Date=2019/09/26 |NCN=[2019] UKSC 42 |Essex issue=98 |Essex page=3 |Other citations=[2020] COPLR 73, [2020] 1 FLR 549, [2019] PTSR 1816, [2020] MHLR 135, [2020] 2 All E...")
 
mNo edit summary
Line 8: Line 8:
|Judges=Hale, Carnwath, Black, Lloyd-Jones, Arden
|Judges=Hale, Carnwath, Black, Lloyd-Jones, Arden
|Parties=D, Birmingham City Council, Equality and Human Rights Commission, Secretary of State for Justice
|Parties=D, Birmingham City Council, Equality and Human Rights Commission, Secretary of State for Justice
|Sentence=Parental responsiblity and DOL
|Sentence=Parental responsibility and DOL
|Summary=It is not within the scope of parental responsibility to consent to living arrangements for a 16- or 17-year-old child which would otherwise amount to a deprivation of liberty within the meaning of [[Article 5]].
|Summary=It is not within the scope of parental responsibility to consent to living arrangements for a 16- or 17-year-old child which would otherwise amount to a deprivation of liberty within the meaning of [[Article 5]].
|Subject=Deprivation of liberty - children
|Subject=Deprivation of liberty - children

Revision as of 17:17, 20 July 2023

Parental responsibility and DOL It is not within the scope of parental responsibility to consent to living arrangements for a 16- or 17-year-old child which would otherwise amount to a deprivation of liberty within the meaning of Article 5.

CASES DATABASE

Full judgment: BAILII

Subject(s):

Date: 26/9/19🔍

Court: Supreme Court🔍

Judge(s):

Parties:

  • D🔍
  • Birmingham City Council🔍
  • Equality and Human Rights Commission🔍
  • Secretary of State for Justice🔍

Citation number(s):

What links here:

Published: 27/2/23 21:50

Cached: 2025-04-26 03:09:34