WBC v Z (2016) EWCOP 4: Difference between revisions

Revision as of 20:00, 15 March 2025

Unwise decision-making "The central issue which arises in this case is whether risks taken by a 20-year old young woman with autism represent 'unwise' decision-making, or evidence her lack of capacity."

Essex search

This case's neutral citation number appears in the following newsletters:

CASES DATABASE

Full judgment: BAILII

Subject(s):

Other capacity cases🔍

Date: 18/1/16🔍

Court: Court of Protection🔍

Judge(s):

Cobb🔍

Parties:

WBC🔍
WBC (Local Authority)🔍
X🔍
Y🔍

Citation number(s):

[2016] EWCOP 4^B
[2016] MHLO 27

What links here:

CT v London Borough of Lambeth [2025] EWCOP 6 (T3)

Published: 29/8/16 21:02

Cached: 2025-04-25 04:02:29

@@ Line 1: / Line 1: @@
-"The central issue which arises in this case is whether risks taken by a 20-year old young woman with autism represent 'unwise' decision-making, or evidence her lack of capacity."
+{{Case
+|Date=2016-01-18
-==External link==
+|NCN=[2016] EWCOP 4
-{{#bailii:(2016) EWCOP 4}}
+|Other citations=[2016] MHLO 27
+|Court=Court of Protection
-[[Category:Other capacity cases]]
+|Judges=Cobb
-[[Category:No summary]]
+|Parties=WBC, WBC (Local Authority), X, Y
-[[Category:Transcript]]
+|Sentence=Unwise decision-making
-[[Category:2016 cases]]
+|Summary="The central issue which arises in this case is whether risks taken by a 20-year old young woman with autism represent 'unwise' decision-making, or evidence her lack of capacity."
+|Subject=Other capacity cases
+|News=No
+|RSS pubdate=2025-3-15 08:00:16 PM
+}}