Re C; C v Wigan Borough Council (2011) EWHC 1539 (Admin): Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 10: | Line 10: | ||
[http://www.brownejacobson.com/resources/bulletins/padded_rooms_and_lessons_for_d.aspx Browne Jacobson Solicitors, 'Padded rooms and lessons for deprivation of liberty and care planning' (20/6/11)] | [http://www.brownejacobson.com/resources/bulletins/padded_rooms_and_lessons_for_d.aspx Browne Jacobson Solicitors, 'Padded rooms and lessons for deprivation of liberty and care planning' (20/6/11)] | ||
[http://localgovernmentlawyer.co.uk/index.php?id=7453 Alex Ruck Keene and Victoria Butler-Cole, 'Managing challenging behaviour' (Local Government Lawyer, 28/7/11)] | |||
[[Category:Deprivation of liberty]] | [[Category:Deprivation of liberty]] | ||
Revision as of 21:38, 14 August 2011
Judgment in related COP and Admin Court proceedings relating to an 18-year old with severe autism and severe learning disabilities living at a residential special school. Issues considered include deprivation of liberty and seclusion. [Summary required.]
Notes
Hard on the heels of Neary v London Borough of Hillingdon (16 June 2011), another local authority has fallen foul of the Court of Protection for an unlawful deprivation of liberty, this time for a child in a special school where his care included seclusion in a padded room.
Like Re Steven Neary; LB Hillingdon v Steven Neary [2011] EWHC 1377 (COP), C v A Local Authority has lessons about deprivation of liberty, care planning and management, and involvement of families more widely.
External link
...
The following categories (in blue boxes) can be clicked to view a list of other pages in the same category: