Re C; C v Wigan Borough Council (2011) EWHC 1539 (Admin): Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
Judgment in related COP and Admin Court proceedings relating to an 18-year old with severe autism and severe learning disabilities living at a residential special school. Issues considered include deprivation of liberty and seclusion. [Summary required.] | Judgment in related COP and Admin Court proceedings relating to an 18-year old with severe autism and severe learning disabilities living at a residential special school. Issues considered include deprivation of liberty and seclusion. [Summary required.] | ||
==Notes== | |||
Hard on the heels of Neary v London Borough of Hillingdon (16 June 2011), another local authority has fallen foul of the Court of Protection for an unlawful deprivation of liberty, this time for a child in a special school where his care included seclusion in a padded room. | Hard on the heels of Neary v London Borough of Hillingdon (16 June 2011), another local authority has fallen foul of the Court of Protection for an unlawful deprivation of liberty, this time for a child in a special school where his care included seclusion in a padded room. | ||
Like Neary, C v A Local Authority has lessons about deprivation of liberty, care planning and management, and involvement of families more widely. | Like [[Re Steven Neary; LB Hillingdon v Steven Neary (2011) EWHC 1377 (COP)]], C v A Local Authority has lessons about deprivation of liberty, care planning and management, and involvement of families more widely. | ||
==External link== | ==External link== | ||
{{bailii|(2011) EWHC 1539 (Admin)}} | {{bailii|(2011) EWHC 1539 (Admin)}} | ||
[http://www.brownejacobson.com/resources/bulletins/padded_rooms_and_lessons_for_d.aspx Browne Jacobson Solicitors, 'Padded rooms and lessons for deprivation of liberty and care planning' (20/6/11)] | |||
[[Category:Deprivation of liberty]] | [[Category:Deprivation of liberty]] | ||
Revision as of 16:46, 21 June 2011
Judgment in related COP and Admin Court proceedings relating to an 18-year old with severe autism and severe learning disabilities living at a residential special school. Issues considered include deprivation of liberty and seclusion. [Summary required.]
Notes
Hard on the heels of Neary v London Borough of Hillingdon (16 June 2011), another local authority has fallen foul of the Court of Protection for an unlawful deprivation of liberty, this time for a child in a special school where his care included seclusion in a padded room.
Like Re Steven Neary; LB Hillingdon v Steven Neary [2011] EWHC 1377 (COP), C v A Local Authority has lessons about deprivation of liberty, care planning and management, and involvement of families more widely.
External link
...
The following categories (in blue boxes) can be clicked to view a list of other pages in the same category: