Re C; C v Wigan Borough Council (2011) EWHC 1539 (Admin): Difference between revisions
m (Text replacement - "{{bailii|" to "{{#bailii:") |
m (Text replacement - " [Summary required.]" to "") |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
Judgment in related COP and Admin Court proceedings relating to an 18-year old with severe autism and severe learning disabilities living at a residential special school. Issues considered include deprivation of liberty and seclusion. | Judgment in related COP and Admin Court proceedings relating to an 18-year old with severe autism and severe learning disabilities living at a residential special school. Issues considered include deprivation of liberty and seclusion. | ||
==Related judgments== | ==Related judgments== | ||
Latest revision as of 19:15, 26 April 2021
Judgment in related COP and Admin Court proceedings relating to an 18-year old with severe autism and severe learning disabilities living at a residential special school. Issues considered include deprivation of liberty and seclusion.
Related judgments
Re CP; WBC v CP [2012] EWHC 1944 (COP), [2012] MHLO 144
Notes
Hard on the heels of Neary v London Borough of Hillingdon (16 June 2011), another local authority has fallen foul of the Court of Protection for an unlawful deprivation of liberty, this time for a child in a special school where his care included seclusion in a padded room.
Like Re Steven Neary; LB Hillingdon v Steven Neary [2011] EWHC 1377 (COP), C v A Local Authority has lessons about deprivation of liberty, care planning and management, and involvement of families more widely.
Citations
Originally Re C; C v A Local Authority [2011] EWHC 1539 (Admin)B
External link
Irwin Mitchell Solicitors, 'Mother Proved Right As Son Freed From Padded Room Hell Makes Progress' (29/3/12). 'Court Anonymity Order Lifted Naming Wigan Borough Council As Local Authority Which Locked Up Her Autistic Son.'