Re C; C v Wigan Borough Council (2011) EWHC 1539 (Admin): Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
|||
Line 12: | Line 12: | ||
[http://localgovernmentlawyer.co.uk/index.php?id=7453 Alex Ruck Keene and Victoria Butler-Cole, 'Managing challenging behaviour' (Local Government Lawyer, 28/7/11)] | [http://localgovernmentlawyer.co.uk/index.php?id=7453 Alex Ruck Keene and Victoria Butler-Cole, 'Managing challenging behaviour' (Local Government Lawyer, 28/7/11)] | ||
[http://www.irwinmitchell.com/news/Pages/Mother-Proved-Right-As-Son-Freed-From-Padded-Room-Hell-Makes-%E2%80%98Remarkable%E2%80%99-Progress.aspx Irwin Mitchell Solicitors, 'Mother Proved Right As Son Freed From Padded Room Hell Makes Progress' (29/3/12)] | |||
[[Category:Deprivation of liberty]] | [[Category:Deprivation of liberty]] |
Revision as of 21:49, 28 April 2012
Judgment in related COP and Admin Court proceedings relating to an 18-year old with severe autism and severe learning disabilities living at a residential special school. Issues considered include deprivation of liberty and seclusion. [Summary required.]
Notes
Hard on the heels of Neary v London Borough of Hillingdon (16 June 2011), another local authority has fallen foul of the Court of Protection for an unlawful deprivation of liberty, this time for a child in a special school where his care included seclusion in a padded room.
Like Re Steven Neary; LB Hillingdon v Steven Neary [2011] EWHC 1377 (COP), C v A Local Authority has lessons about deprivation of liberty, care planning and management, and involvement of families more widely.
External link
...