View source for R v Hurst (2007) EWCA Crim 3436

''The restriction order was set aside as: (1) there was insufficient evidence that it was necessary for the protection of the public from serious harm; (2) the judge did not explain why he had rejected the medical evidence, which was against the imposition of a restriction order.''

==External link==
{{#bailii: [2007] EWCA Crim 3436}}


[[Category:Brief summary]]
[[Category:Transcript]]
[[Category:2007 cases]]
[[Category:Restriction order cases]]