R v Hurst [2007] EWCA Crim 3436
The restriction order was set aside as: (1) there was insufficient evidence that it was necessary for the protection of the public from serious harm; (2) the judge did not explain why he had rejected the medical evidence, which was against the imposition of a restriction order.
External link
The following categories (in blue boxes) can be clicked to view a list of other pages in the same category: