View source for Pankiewicz v Poland 34151/04 (2008) ECHR 148

''It would be too rigid to expect immediate transfer from prison to psychiatric hospital but, although the delay of 2 months 25 days did not at first glance seem particularly excessive, on balance it was not acceptable and violated [[Article 5]](1); the claimant had been compensated by the domestic court so was not a victim for Article 5(3) purposes; the [[Article 6]] complaint was rejected for non-exhaustion of domestic remedies''

==External link==
{{#bailii:[2008] ECHR 148}}


[[Category:ECHR deprivation of liberty cases]]
[[Category:ECHR]]
[[Category:Brief summary]]
[[Category:Transcript]]
[[Category:2008 cases]]