Pankiewicz v Poland 34151/04 [2008] ECHR 148
It would be too rigid to expect immediate transfer from prison to psychiatric hospital but, although the delay of 2 months 25 days did not at first glance seem particularly excessive, on balance it was not acceptable and violated Article 5(1); the claimant had been compensated by the domestic court so was not a victim for Article 5(3) purposes; the Article 6 complaint was rejected for non-exhaustion of domestic remedies
External link
The following categories (in blue boxes) can be clicked to view a list of other pages in the same category: