View source for LBX v K, L and M (2012) EWHC 439 (Fam)

{{Case
|Date=2012/03/06
|NCN=[2012] EWHC 439 (Fam)
|Other citations=[2012] MHLO 185
|Court=High Court (Family Division)
|Judges=Theis
|Parties=LBX, K, L, M
|Judicial history first case=LBX v K, L and M (2010) EWHC 2422 (COP)
|Sentence=Residence
|Summary="The central issue that I have to determine is whether it is in L’s best interests that he should remain in supported living accommodation or return home. He has been living in supported accommodation called the J placement, on a trial basis, since 24th August 2011. The LBX submit that L should remain in supported living accommodation; this is supported by the OS on behalf of L and by M. K contends that L should return to live with him as this accords with his wishes or his wishes are difficult to determine and all the stated benefits that are relied on to support the decision for L to live in supported living accommodation can be achieved by L living at home, with all the additional benefits that living within the family brings L."
|Detail===Thanks==
{{thanks|Quinn, Kathren|Clerk to Theis J}}
|Subject=Other capacity cases
|Judgment=LBX v K, L and M (2012) EWHC 439 (Fam), (2012) MHLO 185.pdf
|News=No
|RSS pubdate=2023/07/27 10:37:31 PM
}}