LBX v K, L and M [2012] EWHC 439 (Fam)
Residence "The central issue that I have to determine is whether it is in L’s best interests that he should remain in supported living accommodation or return home. He has been living in supported accommodation called the J placement, on a trial basis, since 24th August 2011. The LBX submit that L should remain in supported living accommodation; this is supported by the OS on behalf of L and by M. K contends that L should return to live with him as this accords with his wishes or his wishes are difficult to determine and all the stated benefits that are relied on to support the decision for L to live in supported living accommodation can be achieved by L living at home, with all the additional benefits that living within the family brings L."
Thanks
Thanks to Kathren Quinn (Clerk to Theis J) for providing the judgment.Full judgment: Possible Bailii link (not there when checked last night, but might have appeared since)
Download here
Subject(s):
- Other capacity cases🔍
Date: 6/3/12🔍
Court: High Court (Family Division)🔍
Judicial history:
Judge(s):
- Theis🔍
Parties:
Citation number(s):
- [2012] EWHC 439 (Fam)Not on Bailii!
- [2012] MHLO 185
- Re L; K v LBX [2012] EWCA Civ 79
- LBX v K, L and M [2013] EWHC 3230 (Fam)
- LBX v K, L and M [2013] EWHC 4170 (Fam)
- LBX v K, L and M [2010] EWHC 2422 (COP)
- LBX v K, L and M [2011] EWHC 2419 (Fam)
- Re L: K v LBX [2016] EWHC 2607 (Fam)
Published: 8/11/14 20:41
Cached: 2024-11-21 19:02:14
The following categories (in blue boxes) can be clicked to view a list of other pages in the same category: