Re L: K v LBX [2016] EWHC 2607 (Fam)
(Redirected from Re L: K v LBX (2016) EWHC 2607 (Fam), (2016) MHLO 47)
Contact "In essence, K says that this court should intervene because his son lacks capacity to be able to decide contact. More recently he has made an application to remove Miss O'Connell as a litigation friend for L. ... By the order I made on 15 November 2013, I found that L had capacity to decide about residence and care and I made orders under the inherent jurisdiction regulating what contact there should be between L and his father, as I considered him to be a vulnerable adult, he needed orders being made to ensure he retained his capacity... There is no evidence that L's capacity has changed."
Full judgment: BAILII
Subject(s):
- Inherent jurisdiction cases🔍 Older inherent jurisdiction cases can still be found in Category:Other capacity cases
- Other capacity cases🔍
Date: 26/7/16🔍
Court: High Court (Family Division)🔍
Judicial history:
Judge(s):
- Theis🔍
Parties:
Citation number(s):
- [2016] EWHC 2607 (Fam)B
- [2016] MHLO 47
- Re L; K v LBX [2012] EWCA Civ 79
- LBX v K, L and M [2013] EWHC 3230 (Fam)
- LBX v K, L and M [2013] EWHC 4170 (Fam)
- LBX v K, L and M [2010] EWHC 2422 (COP)
- LBX v K, L and M [2011] EWHC 2419 (Fam)
- LBX v K, L and M [2012] EWHC 439 (Fam)
Published: 19/11/16 20:35
Cached: 2024-08-19 21:37:56
The following categories (in blue boxes) can be clicked to view a list of other pages in the same category: