Re L: K v LBX [2016] EWHC 2607 (Fam)

Contact "In essence, K says that this court should intervene because his son lacks capacity to be able to decide contact. More recently he has made an application to remove Miss O'Connell as a litigation friend for L. ... By the order I made on 15 November 2013, I found that L had capacity to decide about residence and care and I made orders under the inherent jurisdiction regulating what contact there should be between L and his father, as I considered him to be a vulnerable adult, he needed orders being made to ensure he retained his capacity... There is no evidence that L's capacity has changed."

CASES DATABASE

Full judgment: BAILII

Subject(s):

• Inherent jurisdiction cases🔍 Older inherent jurisdiction cases can still be found in Category:Other capacity cases
• Other capacity cases🔍

Date: 26/7/16🔍

Court: High Court (Family Division)🔍

Judicial history:

• Re L: K v LBX [2016] EWHC 2607 (Fam)
• LBX v K, L and M [2013] EWHC 4170 (Fam)
• LBX v K, L and M [2013] EWHC 3230 (Fam)
• LBX v K, L and M [2012] EWHC 439 (Fam)
• Re L; K v LBX [2012] EWCA Civ 79
• LBX v K, L and M [2011] EWHC 2419 (Fam)
• LBX v K, L and M [2010] EWHC 2422 (COP)

Judge(s):

• Theis🔍

Parties:

• LBX🔍
• L🔍
• K🔍

Citation number(s):

• [2016] EWHC 2607 (Fam)^B
• [2016] MHLO 47

What links here:

• Re L; K v LBX [2012] EWCA Civ 79
• LBX v K, L and M [2013] EWHC 3230 (Fam)
• LBX v K, L and M [2013] EWHC 4170 (Fam)
• LBX v K, L and M [2010] EWHC 2422 (COP)
• LBX v K, L and M [2011] EWHC 2419 (Fam)
• LBX v K, L and M [2012] EWHC 439 (Fam)

Published: 19/11/16 20:35

Cached: 2024-11-22 01:54:47