Re D (A Child) [2019] UKSC 42
Parental responsibility and DOL It is not within the scope of parental responsibility to consent to living arrangements for a 16- or 17-year-old child which would otherwise amount to a deprivation of liberty within the meaning of Article 5.
Essex
This case has been summarised on page 3 of 39 Essex Chambers, 'Mental Capacity Report' (issue 98, October 2019).Essex search
This case's neutral citation number appears in the following newsletters:Full judgment: BAILII
Subject(s):
- Deprivation of liberty - children🔍 See also: Category:Deprivation of liberty
Date: 26/9/19🔍
Court: Supreme Court🔍
Judicial history:
When D turned 16:
- Re D (A Child) [2019] UKSC 42
- Re D (A Child) [2017] EWCA Civ 1695
- Birmingham City Council v D [2016] EWCOP 8
When D was 15:
Cites:
Judge(s):
Parties:
Citation number(s):
- [2019] UKSC 42B
- [2020] COPLR 73, [2020] 1 FLR 549B, [2019] PTSR 1816, [2020] MHLR 135, [2020] 2 All ER 399, [2019] 3 FCR 631, [2019] WLR 5403, [2019] 1 WLR 5403B, [2019] HRLR 18, (2019) 22 CCL Rep 475, [2019] WLR(D) 587B, (2020) 171 BMLR 51
- Nielsen v Denmark 10929/84 [1988] ECHR 23
- Re D (A Child: deprivation of liberty) [2015] EWHC 922 (Fam)
- Birmingham City Council v D [2016] EWCOP 8
- Re D (A Child) [2017] EWCA Civ 1695
- 39 Essex Chambers, 'Mental Capacity Report' (issue 98, October 2019)
- Re RN (Deprivation of Liberty and Parental Consent) [2022] EWHC 2576 (Fam)
- Annual Review 2023
Published: 27/2/23 21:50
Cached: 2024-11-24 09:20:09
The following categories (in blue boxes) can be clicked to view a list of other pages in the same category: