PJV v Assistant Director Adult Social Care Newcastle City Council [2016] EWCOP 7

CICA "I am pleased record that the parties addressed these points [(i) the imposition of a term in a trust directed to the risk that a perpetrator would benefit from the award, (ii) the terms of the appointment of a deputy, (iii) the declaratory relief granted and the discharge of the Deputy, and (iv) the Peters undertaking and a restriction on the powers of the trustees]. I attach in Parts 1 and 2 of the Schedule hereto (i) the wording for the appointment of a deputy that was agreed, and (ii) the terms of the trust that were agreed (anonymised save for the identity of the original trustee). I also record that, as the appointment of the deputy was discharged, it was agreed that there was no need for a Peters undertaking. It seems to me that the agreed wording for the appointment of a deputy should be a useful precedent or starting point in other cases." (CICA case.)

Essex search

This case's neutral citation number appears in the following newsletters:

39 Essex Chambers, 'Mental Capacity Law Newsletter' (issue 62, February 2016)

CASES DATABASE

Full judgment: BAILII

Subject(s):

Other capacity cases🔍

Date: 11/1/16🔍

Court: Court of Protection🔍

Judicial history:

First judgment is Newcastle City Council v PV [2015] EWCOP 22, [2015] MHLO 51

Judge(s):

Charles🔍

Parties:

PJV🔍
Assistant Director Adult Social Care Newcastle City Council🔍
Director of Social Services Newcastle City Council🔍
Criminal Injuries Compensation Authority🔍

Citation number(s):

[2016] EWCOP 7^B
[2016] Fam 229^B, [2016] COPLR 394, [2016] WTLR 705, [2016] 2 WLR 1327^B, [2016] MHLO 28

What links here:

Newcastle City Council v PV [2015] EWCOP 22, [2015] MHLO 51

Published: 29/8/16 21:22

Cached: 2025-03-29 14:02:08